Talk:GlitchDex: Difference between revisions

From Glitch City Wiki
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Torchickens in topic Shall we add some kind of incomplete tag?
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
>Torchickens
No edit summary
>Torchickens
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
@ the person above, for convenience please sign comments.
@ the person above, for convenience please sign comments.
3trainerpoke has already been indexed on the glitchdex as hex 000. The family number 176 refers to the dex number the game interprets the glitch. For example, even though Rhydon is hex 001 its family number (dex number) is 112. Please be a bit more careful. --[[User:Torchickens|Torchickens]] 20:57, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
3trainerpoke has already been indexed on the glitchdex as hex 000. The family number 176 refers to the dex number the game interprets the glitch. For example, even though Rhydon is hex 001 its family number (dex number) is 112. Please be a bit more careful. --[[User:Torchickens|Torchickens]] 20:57, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

==Shall we add some kind of incomplete tag?==

Now that the wiki is now open to the public shall we inform other users that the GlitchDex is still incomplete? (As it does not include the different variations of Missingno.) --[[User:Torchickens|Torchickens]] 18:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:49, 28 March 2010

FYI, 3TRAINERPOKE is hex 0 (Unsigned comment)


@ the person above, for convenience please sign comments. 3trainerpoke has already been indexed on the glitchdex as hex 000. The family number 176 refers to the dex number the game interprets the glitch. For example, even though Rhydon is hex 001 its family number (dex number) is 112. Please be a bit more careful. --Torchickens 20:57, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Shall we add some kind of incomplete tag?

Now that the wiki is now open to the public shall we inform other users that the GlitchDex is still incomplete? (As it does not include the different variations of Missingno.) --Torchickens 18:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]