Anonymous user
Talk:Party-based map distortion glitch: Difference between revisions
Talk:Party-based map distortion glitch (view source)
Revision as of 03:10, 30 September 2019
, 4 years agono edit summary
>Bbbbbbbbba (Created page with "Evie, I noticed that you changed '''"1. Party Pokémon 1-6 have over 0 current HP if over 0 max HP."''' to '''"1. Party Pokémon 1-6 have over 0 max HP if >0 current HP."''' T...") |
>Torchickens No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
Evie, I noticed that you changed '''"1. Party Pokémon 1-6 have over 0 current HP if over 0 max HP."''' to '''"1. Party Pokémon 1-6 have over 0 max HP if >0 current HP."''' Those do not seem to be the same condition: By my reading, if you have a fainted ordinary Pokémon, then it doesn't satisfy the first condition, but do satisfy the second condition. To dissatisfy the second condition, you probably need a glitched Pokémon with 0 max HP and >0 current HP. The first condition seems more likely to be a concern, but I guess when it comes to glitching, everything is possible. Do you have some evidence that shows that the second condition is correct? [[User:Bbbbbbbbba|Bbbbbbbbba]] ([[User talk:Bbbbbbbbba|talk]]) 20:54, 29 September 2019 (-06)
:Basically, 0/0 (0 current HP, 0 maximum HP) is allowed but 1/0 (1 current HP 0 maximum HP), 2/0 etc. are not as these cause [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXDGU1vaEP0 a freeze], possibly a division by zero in HP bar calculations. Anything else (including e.g. a fainted Pokémon with 20 maximum HP) is allowed in slots 1-6. I think the original condition text before it was changed may have been a mistake when I made that video in 2015. Will test this again from a new save with memory editor one moment. Sorry for the confusion. <span style="color:#FF00FF><font face="Blackadder ITC"><span style="font-size:150%">[[User talk:Torchickens|<span style="color:#FF00FF;">From Evie (Torchickens) ✿</span>]]</font></span> 21:10, 29 September 2019 (-06)
| |||