Anonymous user
Talk:Trapped at burgled house oversight: Difference between revisions
Talk:Trapped at burgled house oversight (view source)
Revision as of 03:24, 24 February 2019
, 5 years agono edit summary
>Bbbbbbbbba No edit summary |
>Sherkel No edit summary |
||
Line 9:
:
: This glitch is taken from Legendary Star Blob, and they got the report from someone called おくとろん. All credits should go to them. --[[User:Bbbbbbbbba|Bbbbbbbbba]] ([[User talk:Bbbbbbbbba|talk]]) 15:46, 23 February 2019 (-06)
::While you're correct about the "boundary", I'm not sure it matters in the way you're implying it does. What in particular makes you say it should be such a big focus? The site's about everything past the boundary, regardless of how arguably close or beyond it a particular exploit or result might be.
::Sure, there are a handful of glitches that require crossing that boundary before beginning. Take any variant of the LOL glitch or Text pointer manipulation, for instance. The issue is that when it comes to ''procedures'' that need to follow another, there are a lot fewer that have their own pages. ''Results'' such as GlitchDex entries are completely separate from this. We could have a huge category for natural glitches that includes most pages that have procedures outlined, or even group all sub-glitches of a given one on the same page...but as you said, it can be nebulous which is which. The first option was an organizational mess, and the same would go for the other. I suggested a possible separate category for non-natural glitches at one point; would you be in favor of that?
::Not to worry, I understand what this is. The possibility the player has a full bag after trading Cut over isn't too much of a stretch.
::Thanks for the thoughtful response, anyhow! Editors like you are invaluable to the site. I'll add the attribution to Legendary Star Blob. [[User:Sherkel|Sherkel]] ([[User talk:Sherkel|talk]]) 21:23, 23 February 2019 (-06)
| |||