Talk:TypeDex: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Evie (Torchickens) in topic ??? type
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This type (belonging to Curse in Generation II) is missing. I've also heard rumours that if you hack it as a damaging move, it causes some more unexpected errors. Something like it is neither physical or special? Needs confirming. [[User:Evie (Torchickens)|Evie (Torchickens)]] ([[User talk:Evie (Torchickens)|talk]]) 11:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC) |
This type (belonging to Curse in Generation II) is missing. I've also heard rumours that if you hack it as a damaging move, it causes some more unexpected errors. Something like it is neither physical or special? Needs confirming. [[User:Evie (Torchickens)|Evie (Torchickens)]] ([[User talk:Evie (Torchickens)|talk]]) 11:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
: |
:Its index number is 0x13 in hex (dec:19). [[User:Evie (Torchickens)|Evie (Torchickens)]] ([[User talk:Evie (Torchickens)|talk]]) 11:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:50, 2 May 2024
??? type
This type (belonging to Curse in Generation II) is missing. I've also heard rumours that if you hack it as a damaging move, it causes some more unexpected errors. Something like it is neither physical or special? Needs confirming. Evie (Torchickens) (talk) 11:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Its index number is 0x13 in hex (dec:19). Evie (Torchickens) (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)