Template talk:Gdex: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 14 years ago by DavidJCobb in topic Link Text
Content added Content deleted
>DavidJCobb |
>DavidJCobb (Thought Template edits needed approval, too.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
It would be good if a second unnamed parameter were to be added, to allow the specification of the link's text. {{gdex|GSC:000}} isn't as recognizable as, say, [[GlitchDex/GSC:000|?????]]. It may help reduce the number of broken links on this wiki (a lot of people seem to use links like [[?????]]). |
It would be good if a second unnamed parameter were to be added, to allow the specification of the link's text. {{gdex|GSC:000}} isn't as recognizable as, say, [[GlitchDex/GSC:000|?????]]. It may help reduce the number of broken links on this wiki (a lot of people seem to use links like [[?????]]). |
||
I have |
I have altered the template to do exactly that. This alterationallows the syntax <code><nowiki>{{gdex|GSC:000|?????}}</nowiki></code>, which will result in <code><nowiki>[[GlitchDex/GSC:000|?????]]</nowiki></code>, or {{gdex|GSC:000|?????}}. |
||
[[User:DavidJCobb|DavidJCobb]] 20:27, 5 July 2009 (UTC) |
[[User:DavidJCobb|DavidJCobb]] 20:27, 5 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 20:29, 5 July 2009
Link Text
It would be good if a second unnamed parameter were to be added, to allow the specification of the link's text. GSC:000 isn't as recognizable as, say, ?????. It may help reduce the number of broken links on this wiki (a lot of people seem to use links like ?????).
I have altered the template to do exactly that. This alterationallows the syntax {{gdex|GSC:000|?????}}, which will result in [[GlitchDex/GSC:000|?????]], or ?????.