Template talk:Prototype policy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
>Sherkel (Please read!) |
>Torchickens No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We haven't collectively come to an agreement on how to treat these yet, including whether or not one admin can say so. That discussion can probably happen when the one about Ganix and Wack0's memberships is over. Until we have decided, we should keep what we have as it is, especially with the additional confirmation the leaks are real. [[User:Sherkel|Sherkel]] ([[User talk:Sherkel|talk]]) 14:54, 29 December 2019 (-06) |
We haven't collectively come to an agreement on how to treat these yet, including whether or not one admin can say so. That discussion can probably happen when the one about Ganix and Wack0's memberships is over. Until we have decided, we should keep what we have as it is, especially with the additional confirmation the leaks are real. [[User:Sherkel|Sherkel]] ([[User talk:Sherkel|talk]]) 14:54, 29 December 2019 (-06) |
||
:I'll wait. I'm sorry for acting straight away. <span style="color:#FF00FF><font face="Blackadder ITC"><span style="font-size:150%">[[User talk:Torchickens|<span style="color:#FF00FF;">From Evie (Torchickens) ✿</span>]]</font></span> 15:26, 29 December 2019 (-06) |
|||
Latest revision as of 21:28, 29 December 2019
We haven't collectively come to an agreement on how to treat these yet, including whether or not one admin can say so. That discussion can probably happen when the one about Ganix and Wack0's memberships is over. Until we have decided, we should keep what we have as it is, especially with the additional confirmation the leaks are real. Sherkel (talk) 14:54, 29 December 2019 (-06)
- I'll wait. I'm sorry for acting straight away. From Evie (Torchickens) ✿ 15:26, 29 December 2019 (-06)