User talk:Blahpy: Difference between revisions

From Glitch City Wiki
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Torchickens in topic Hi (Reply)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
>Torchickens
(New page: ==Hi (Reply)== The user-page should not be deleted because according to GARY 'M 9 he/she is only banned for a temporary amount of time and will be unbanned some time next week. Thanks for...)
 
>Abwayax
m (moved User talk:OwnageMuch to User talk:Blahpy: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "OwnageMuch" to "Blahpy")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Hi (Reply)==
==Hi (Reply)==


The user-page should not be deleted because according to GARY 'M 9 he/she is only banned for a temporary amount of time and will be unbanned some time next week. Thanks for taking your time to make a Candidate for Deletion template though. --[[User:Torchickens|Torchickens]] 17:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
The user-page should not be deleted because according to [[User:GARY 'M 9|GARY 'M 9]] he/she is only banned for a temporary amount of time and will be unbanned later next week. Thanks for taking your time to make a Candidate for Deletion template though. --[[User:Torchickens|Torchickens]] 17:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
:No, but I edited that out just after the reversion. Considering his/her confidentiality, I didn't want the talk page to be edited too much so I only took out those five words 'by a...', if he was banned permanently it would be suitable to delete and protect the page, but since this is only a temporary ban the userpage should remain as it stands. Hope that helps. --[[User:Torchickens|Torchickens]] 14:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:02, 1 October 2011

Hi (Reply)

The user-page should not be deleted because according to GARY 'M 9 he/she is only banned for a temporary amount of time and will be unbanned later next week. Thanks for taking your time to make a Candidate for Deletion template though. --Torchickens 17:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, but I edited that out just after the reversion. Considering his/her confidentiality, I didn't want the talk page to be edited too much so I only took out those five words 'by a...', if he was banned permanently it would be suitable to delete and protect the page, but since this is only a temporary ban the userpage should remain as it stands. Hope that helps. --Torchickens 14:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]