User talk:Zeroman: Difference between revisions
(→Regarding the bootstrap for 4F: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Feel free to join the GCRI Discord if you'd like to discuss stuff like this further! [[User:TimoVM|TimoVM]] ([[User talk:TimoVM|talk]]) 20:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC) |
Feel free to join the GCRI Discord if you'd like to discuss stuff like this further! [[User:TimoVM|TimoVM]] ([[User talk:TimoVM|talk]]) 20:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
Yeah, I know that, but I just seem to prefer my method (which involves only three bytes instead of four; I prefer to use "($C3, $22 or $21, $D3) at (glitch item's effect pointer)" instead of "($21, $22 or $21, $D3, $E9) at (glitch item's effect pointer)." Thanks for your help, TimoVM.[[User:Zeroman|Zeroman]] ([[User talk:Zeroman|talk]]) 18:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:37, 8 January 2024
Regarding the bootstrap for 4F
Just a small bit of advice regarding the 4F bootstrap, I've noticed that you jump to the item pack using jp $D322.
For 4F, it is heavily recommended to go for a slightly longer bootstrap in the form of 21 22 D3 E9 for Red/Blue and 21 21 D3 E9 for Yellow (ld hl, $D322/$D321 and jp hl). This is done because nearly all 8F setups use jp hl to perform the final jump to the item bag, meaning that quite a few older item codes assume a register state in hl.
By using a jp hl bootstrap, you can ensure complete compatibility with older item codes.
Feel free to join the GCRI Discord if you'd like to discuss stuff like this further! TimoVM (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, I know that, but I just seem to prefer my method (which involves only three bytes instead of four; I prefer to use "($C3, $22 or $21, $D3) at (glitch item's effect pointer)" instead of "($21, $22 or $21, $D3, $E9) at (glitch item's effect pointer)." Thanks for your help, TimoVM.Zeroman (talk) 18:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)